Tuesday, Jun 18th | Last update02:49:59 AM GMT
You are here: World Make TOT News Your Homepage

Newsbanner

World


Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

A court in Peru has sentenced the last of the original leaders of the Shining Path rebels to life in prison.

  • PDF
alt
 
A court in Peru has sentenced the last of the original leaders of the Shining Path rebels to life in prison.
 
Judges in the Peruvian capital, Lima, found Florindo Flores, who's known as Comrade Artemio, guilty of terrorism, drug trafficking and money laundering.
 
He was also ordered to pay a fine of $183m (£117m).
 
The Shining Path rebels were severely weakened in the 1990s after failing to install a Communist state, but some remain active in southern Peru.
 
After hours of sentencing, Judge Clotilde Cavero said: "It was proven that he (Artemio) ordered the execution of a number of civilians, police and soldiers.
 
"It was proven that he belonged to the Central Committee of the Shining Path.
 
"It was proven that he was the top leader in the (Alto) Huallaga (Valley)," she said.
 
Cocaine link
During the trial which lasted six months, Artemio, 51, had denied the terrorism charges but referred to himself as a "revolutionary".
 
He was captured and wounded last year after a clash with troops in Alto Huallaga, a former rebel stronghold and cocaine-producing region.
 
He admitted in December 2011 that the Shining Path had been defeated, and told reporters in his jungle hideout that the remaining rebels were ready to have talks with the government.
 
But President Ollanta Humala has been adamant that his government will not "negotiate with terrorists"."They are cold-blooded killers, who kidnap children, don't respect basic rights, and try to use terror and extortion to change the democratic nature of the country," Mr Humala said last September.
 
Inspired by Maoism, the Shining Path tried to lead a "People's War" to overthrow what they called "bourgeois democracy".
 
Almost 70,000 people died or disappeared in more than a decade of internal conflict.
 
But the rebels were severely weakened after the capture of their founder Abimael Guzman in 1992.
 
They now remain active in the Ene-Apurimac Valley, a remote jungle region near Cuzco in southern Peru that is dominated by the cocaine trade.

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

At least five people are dead and several others injured after a gun rampage in the beachfront city of Santa Monica, California, police say.

  • PDF
alt
 
 
At least five people are dead and several others injured after a gun rampage in the beachfront city of Santa Monica, California, police say.
 
The attack began at a house and ended on a college campus where police say they shot the gunman in the library.
 
Police initially put the death toll at six, but later revised it to five people dead, including the shooter.
 
The gunman was in his late 20s and had been carrying an assault-style rifle, say witnesses.
 
President Barack Obama was at a fundraiser not far from where the shooting unfolded just before noon on Friday.
 
'Boom, boom, boom'
The gunman, dressed in black and wearing an ammunition belt and bullet-proof jacket, began by firing shots at the house, witnesses said.
The property was then engulfed by fire although it is not clear how the blaze started.
 
The Los Angeles Times reports that the first two victims were the gunman's father and brother.
 
Neighbour Jerry Rathner said she witnessed the shooting from her veranda, the Associated Press reported.
 
The gunman then walked to the street corner, pointed his gun at a driver and told her to pull over.
 
He signalled to another car with a female driver to slow down and fired into the car several times.
 
Ms Rathner said she rushed to help the victim and saw she had a shoulder injury.
 
"He fired three to four shots into the car, boom, boom, boom, right at her," Ms Rathner said.
 
Authorities say the violence then moved to a street corner near Santa Monica College where the suspect fired at passing vehicles.
 
The gunman then entered the campus where he is said to have shot a woman as he made his way toward the college library, where students were studying for final exams.
 
"We saw a woman get shot in the head," administrative assistant Trena Johnson told the Associated Press. "I haven't been able to stop shaking."Witness Lisa Peters told the BBC she was at the campus radio station when they received a call that shots had been fired.
 
"We were on lockdown and we all tried to remain calm. I was there for about two and a half hours, but it seemed much longer than that," she said.
 
"Suddenly I heard police and swat teams yelling and saying to us that we had to evacuate.
 
"It was very dramatic. On leaving the campus, we walked right passed a body which we think was the gunman."
 
Police Chief Jaqueline Seabrooks said the gunman entered the college library and fired at people but did not hit anyone.
 
"The officers came in and directly engaged the suspect and he was shot and killed on the scene," she said.
 
Student Jimes Gillespie, 20, said he saw a car riddled with bullet holes, shattered glass and a baby seat in the back.
 
Authorities also took into custody a second man dressed in black with the words "life is a gamble" on the back of his shirt.
 
"We are not convinced 100% that the suspect who was killed operated in a solo or alone capacity," Chief Seabrooks added.
 
Three women were taken to the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, where a doctor said one patient had died, one was undergoing surgery and the third was in a serious condition.
 
Three more patients were taken to the UCLA Medical Center Santa Monica to be treated for minor injuries.
 
The shooting unfolded a few miles from where President Obama was speaking at a political fundraiser.
 
The Secret Service, which protects the US president, said the incident did not affect his schedule.

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

Japan and France agreed on June 7 to deepen their cooperation on nuclear technology

  • PDF
alt
 
Japan and France agreed on June 7 to deepen their cooperation on nuclear technology and to discuss joint development of military equipment, vowing to raise the tenor of their partnership.
 
Visiting French President Francois Hollande and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe issued a joint statement pledging to prevent nuclear proliferation while raising safety standards for nuclear energy.
 
The two sides also agreed to establish a regular dialogue between their defense ministers that would include talks on cooperating in developing and managing exports of defense equipment. Japan has similar arrangements with the United States and Britain.
 
“This visit had a new ambience,” Hollande said after summit talks with Abe, pointing to closer security and political ties as evidence of a closer partnership.
 
Japan has expressed concern over French exports of equipment that potentially might have military uses to China, including the sale last year of equipment used to help helicopters land on ships. Providing China with such a capability alarms Tokyo given its tensions with Beijing over disputed islands in the East China Sea.
 
Hollande said he reiterated France’s insistence that the helicopters were not intended for military use. Asked about the strains between Japan and China, which the French president visited just weeks earlier, Hollande urged the two sides to pursue dialogue in resolving their disagreement and to above all observe international law.
 
Partnership in Turkey’s nuclear power plant
 
Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and France’s Areva are cooperating on construction of a reactor in Turkey, and Abe is eager to promote further Japanese exports of atomic technology despite the disaster at Fukushima following the March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami.
 
A Japanese-French alliance led by Mitsubishi and France’s Areva will build Turkey’s second nuclear power plant, according to the deal. The agreement brings together Mitsubishi and Itochu to build the plant, which is to have a capacity of around 4,800 megawatts, with the main operator France’s GDF Suez.
 
The two leaders pledged a united front in fighting against proliferation of nuclear technology for non-peaceful means and in combating terrorism. Hollande praised Abe, meanwhile, for his efforts to end a long spell of deflation and revive Japan’s stagnant economy.
 
“This is good news for us,” he said. “If Japan succeeds, then France and Europe as a whole will benefit.”
 
But in a swipe at those who have been urging France and other European nations to abandon painful austerity programs in following Japan’s example of aggressive government spending and monetary policy, he said, “The conditions are different.”
 
“Each deciding what is best for their own country is what we must do,” Hollande said.
 
The two countries exchanged agreements on various joint projects, including nuclear fuel recycling and tourism promotion. Hollande’s three-day state visit ends on June 8.

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

Turkey has reacted angrily to the Vatican following a statement from Pope

  • PDF
alt
 
Turkey has reacted angrily to the Vatican following a statement from Pope Francis describing the mass killings of Armenians during World War I as “the first genocide of the twentieth century” during a meeting with a delegation led by Patriarch of Cilicia of Armenian Catholics on June 3.
 
“The Turkish Foreign Ministry delivered Turkey’s views on the issue and expressed disappointment to the embassy in Ankara and Vatican in Rome,” a Turkish diplomat told the Hürriyet Daily News on June 7.
 
Pope Francis described the mass killings of Armenians during World War I as “the first genocide of the 20th century” during a meeting with a delegation led by Patriarch of Cilicia of Armenian Catholics on June 3.
 
The pope met with members of the delegation and when one of them said that she was a descendant of genocide victims, he replied, “The first genocide of the 20th Century was that of the Armenians,” reiterating his earlier recognition of the mass killings as “Armenian Genocide” while he was the head of the Catholic Church in Buenos Aires as a cardinal.
 
In 2006, during events marking the 91st anniversary of the killings in Buenos Aires, he had urged Turkey to recognize “the genocide” as the “gravest crime of Ottoman Turkey against the Armenian people and the entire humanity.”
 
Commenting on the issue, Armenian Apostolic Church Diocese of Gougark Bishop Sebouh Chuljyan Primate said, “The pope is speaking out a historical truth. Turkey needs to see the pains and should face the genocide,” he told the Hürriyet Daily News, adding that the archives of the Vatican may be opened to investigate the issue further. 
 
The director of the Armenian National Committee of South America, Alfonso Tabakian, explained that this was the first such statement from the pontiff since being elevated to pope and leader of the Roman Catholic Church.
 
Tabakian called the statement “very important since his words transcend any state or religion,” according to the Armenian weekly website

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

A more accurate test for Down's syndrome

  • PDF
 
alt
 
A more accurate test for Down's syndrome which can also be given earlier in pregnancy than current checks has been developed, say experts.
 
A study of 1,000 pregnancies found the test of foetal DNA in maternal blood can show a baby is "almost certainly" affected or unaffected by Down's.
 
The King's College London team behind it said it could help women decide if they needed further, invasive tests.
 
The Down's Syndrome Association said the new test was not "imminent".
 
Around 750 babies are born with Down's syndrome each year in the UK.
 
The condition is caused by the presence of an extra copy of chromosome 21, which occurs by chance.
 
'Nearly diagnostic'
Women are currently tested between weeks 11 and 13 of pregnancy. They have an ultrasound, during which a pocket of fluid at the back of a baby's neck - the nuchal translucency - is measured. Babies with Down's syndrome tend to have more fluid than normal.
Women also have a blood test to check for abnormal levels of certain proteins and hormones.
 
They are then given an estimation of the chances of their child having Down's - which also takes their age into account - such as one in 150 or one in 700.
 
Each of the three elements is only an indication.
 
But based on the result, those with a higher estimated risk can have one of two invasive and potentially risky tests.
 
Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) involves testing a small sample of the placenta, while an amniocentesis tests the amniotic fluid around the baby.
 
Both tests carry a one in 100 risk of miscarriage.
 
Prof Kypros Nicolaides, who is leading the research and also developed the nuchal fold test, says the foetal DNA (cfDNA) test is much more definitive.
 
The test shows there is either more than a 99% chance, or less than one in 10,000 that their baby has Down's syndrome.
 
The research showing it is more sensitive, and less likely to offer a false-positive result, is published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
 
Prof Nicolaides said: "This test is nearly diagnostic. It tells you almost certainly your baby has Down's or almost certainly it does not.
 
"From a woman's perspective, that is a much more clear message about what to do next."
 
Between 3% and 5% of pregnant women currently undergo invasive testing.
 
The foetal DNA test has seen a rate of less than 0.5%.
 
'Lip-service'
Next month, the professor and his team are to begin a two-year prospective study of 20,000 women in NHS hospitals to further assess the test.
 
However it currently costs around £400, so Prof Nicolaides says - if the cost does not fall - it may be that the NHS could use the conventional test (which costs £180) for all pregnant women, then the foetal DNA test for those at a higher risk - perhaps 10-15% of all pregnancies.
He said his aim was to offer women clearer information to allow them to make choices about how they should proceed.
 
"It has been trendy to say we must involve patients in the decision-making process, but it has often been something we only pay lip-service to.
 
"If the risk is say one in 250, how do they decide? When they have much more clarity, a clearer result, it is made easier."
 
Carol Boys, chief executive of the Down's Syndrome Association (DSA) said: "The latest results from Prof Nicolaides and his team at King's College show that the use of an early non-invasive blood test that could be used throughout the national screening programme is still a fair way off.
 
"The DSA considers it far more important at this point to focus on providing relevant, accurate and up-to-date information about Down's syndrome, delivered by midwives and associated health professionals, who have received our targeted training prior to any screening test.
 
"We are currently seeking full funding to ensure that our Tell it Right, Start it Right training can be rolled out nationally in readiness for the time when the non-invasive diagnostic test in early pregnancy is a reality in the UK.
 
"We do not believe that this is imminent." 

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

Mr Obama said his administration had struck "the right balance" between security and privacy.

  • PDF
alt
 
 
President Barack Obama has defended newly revealed US government phone and internet surveillance programmes, saying they are closely overseen by Congress and the courts.
 
Mr Obama said his administration had struck "the right balance" between security and privacy.
 
He also stressed US internet communications of US citizens and residents were not targeted.
 
And he tried to reassure the US "nobody is listening to your phone calls".
 
Mr Obama was commenting on revelations this week in the Guardian and Washington Post newspapers that the US National Security Agency (NSA) was collecting or tapping into vast amounts of telephone and internet communications data.
 
The news accounts - subsequently confirmed by officials - roiled Washington DC, with privacy advocates criticising the surveillance as an unlawful intrusion and many in Congress defending the programmes as appropriate counter-terrorism tools.
         Healthy scepticism'             On Wednesday night, the UK's Guardian newspaper reported a secret court had ordered phone company Verizon to hand over to the NSA millions of records on telephone call "metadata".
 
That report was followed by revelations in both the Washington Post and Guardian that the NSA tapped directly into the servers of nine internet firms including Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo to track online communication in a programme known as Prism.
 
In California on Friday, Mr Obama noted both NSA programmes had been authorised repeatedly by Congress and were subject to continual oversight by congressional intelligence committees and by secret intelligence courts.
 
The president said he had come into office with a "healthy scepticism" of both programmes, but after evaluating them and establishing further safeguards, he decided "it was worth it".
 
"You can't have 100% security, and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience," Mr Obama said.Acknowledging "some trade-offs involved", he said, "We're going to have to make some choices."
 
Senior US Senator Dianne Feinstein confirmed on Thursday that the Verizon phone records order published by the Guardian was a three-month extension of an ongoing request to Verizon. Intelligence analysts say there are likely similar orders for other major communications firms.
 
The data requested includes telephone numbers, calling card numbers, the serial numbers of phones used and the time and duration of calls. It does not include the content of a call or the callers' addresses or financial information.Prism was reportedly developed in 2007 out of a programme of domestic surveillance without warrants that was set up by President George W Bush after the 9/11 attacks.
 
Prism reportedly does not collect user data, but is able to pull out material that matches a set of search terms.
 
James Clapper, director of US national intelligence, said in a statement on Thursday the internet communications surveillance programme was "designed to facilitate the acquisition of foreign intelligence information concerning non-US persons located outside the United States".
 
"It cannot be used to intentionally target any US citizen, any other US person, or anyone located within the United States," he added.
 
'Assault on Constitution'But while US citizens were not intended to be the targets of surveillance, the Washington Post says large quantities of content from Americans are nevertheless screened in order to track or learn more about the target.
 
The Prism programme has become a major contributor to the president's daily intelligence briefing and accounts for almost one in seven intelligence reports, it adds.
 
Mr Clapper said the programme, under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, was recently reauthorised by Congress after hearings and debate.
 
In Congress, reaction to the revelations was split.
 
"When law-abiding Americans make phone calls, who they call, when they call and where they call from is private information," said Democratic Senator Ron Wyden.
 
"As a result of the disclosures that came to light today, now we're going to have a real debate in the Congress and the country and that's long overdue."
 
Republican Senator Rand Paul called the programmes "an astounding assault on the Constitution''.
 
But his colleagues Republican Senator Lindsay Graham and Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein both defended the phone records practice on Thursday.
 

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

The UN estimates more than 10 million Syrians - half the population - will need help by the end of the year.

  • PDF
alt
 
The United Nations has launched the largest appeal in its history - seeking $5bn (£3.2bn; 3.7bn euros) for humanitarian aid to Syria.
 
The UN estimates more than 10 million Syrians - half the population - will need help by the end of the year.
 
As many as four million children are in need of urgent humanitarian assistance, the UN children's agency Unicef says.
 
UN humanitarian officials have admitted they may struggle to raise the record sums they are now asking for.
 
Governments were criticised for being slow to commit funds to the previous UN target of $1.5bn for the first six months of this year, the BBC's Nick Childs says.UN officials say most of that money - $1.2bn - has now been committed, he adds.
 
But, in Geneva on Friday, the UN said it had revised up the amount of funding needed because of the worsening security situation in Syria.'Masking a human tragedy'
One in three Syrians is now in need of urgent humanitarian assistance, UN Emergency Relief Co-ordinator Valerie Amos said in a news conference on Friday.
 
"Between January and April, the number of people displaced in Syria more than doubled. These are massive figures, but those figures mask a human tragedy," she added.
 
The UN expects the number of refugees - currently more than 1.5 million - to leap to nearly 3.5 million by the end of 2013.
 
Antonio Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), told reporters that refugee camps were currently receiving 7,000 new arrivals every day - putting huge pressure on Syria's neighbours.
 
"Funding Syria's humanitarian needs is a matter not only of generosity but enlightened self-interest," he said.
 
Lebanon and Jordan, which host about half a million refugees each, have joined the appeal, asking for donations of $450 million (£289m) and $380 million (£245m) respectively to cover the financial costs.
 
Within Syria itself, UN officials estimate that nearly seven million people will be dependent on aid, having been forced to flee their homes.Many of those within Syria have already suffered or witnessed appalling violence, lost family members and are living without food, shelter, medical care and schooling.
 
Unicef is warning of a lost generation of young Syrians.
 
The $5bn sought by the UN would cover only the most basic needs of people until the end of this year.
 
Aid workers say that, even if the fighting were to stop tomorrow, Syria and its people would still need years to recover.Responding to the UN's latest appeal, International Development Secretary Justine Greening said the UK is "ready to play its role" and urged other donors to make contributions.
 
The UK-based Save the Children charity says "money alone will not be enough", calling for greater access for aid agencies to worst affected areas of Syria as an urgent priority.
 
Access to Qusair
The UN-led appeal was launched just days after Syrian troops backed by Lebanese Hezbollah militants regained control of the key town of Qusair after weeks of fierce fighting with rebel forces.
 
Qusair, which lies 10km (six miles) from the Lebanese border, is a major supply route for both sides of the conflict.
 
Hundreds of injured civilians are reported to be trapped in Qusair with little access to medical supplies, food and water.
 
However, on Friday Russia agreed to a UN Security Council statement demanding "immediate, safe and unhindered" access to the town after blocking an earlier version of the communique.
 
Meanwhile, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK-based activist group, said pro-Assad forces were "massing in their thousands" in the northern province of Aleppo in a bid to cut off rebel supply routes to Turkey.
 
This follows the rebel fighters' attempted takeover on Thursday of the UN-monitored crossing in the Golan Heights separating Israeli and Syrian troops.
 
The Syrian government forces retook the symbolically significant position just hours later, an Israeli military force said.

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

Bales earlier admitted killing the civilians, saying there was "not a good reason in this world" for the massacre.

  • PDF
alt
 
US soldier Robert Bales has avoided the death penalty for murdering 16 Afghan civilians last year, after a military judge accepted his guilty plea.
 
Bales earlier admitted killing the civilians, saying there was "not a good reason in this world" for the massacre.
 
He said he wandered away from a US outpost in Kandahar province and attacked two villages nearby in the early hours of 11 March 2012.
 
A jury must now decide if Bales's life term will include possible parole.
 
The sentencing hearing has been scheduled for 19 August.
 
The judge, as well as the commander of Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state, where the hearing has taken place, were required to approve any plea deal.
 
'Without justification'
At the start of the hearing on Wednesday, military judge Col Jeffery Nance asked Bales to describe why he thought he was guilty.
 
The soldier read from a statement describing each killing in the same terms:
 
"I left the VSP [Village Stability Platform] and went to the nearby village of Alkozai. While inside a compound in Alkozai, I observed a female I now know to be Na'ikmarga. I formed the intent to kill Na'ikmarga, and I did kill Na'ikmarga by shooting her with a firearm. This act was without legal justification, sir."
When asked why he committed the murders, Bales responded: "Sir, as far as why I've asked that question a million times since then. There's not a good reason in this world for why I did the horrible things I did."
 
Asked about burning the victims, Bales said he remembered a kerosene lantern in the room and recalled a fire and having matches in his pocket when he returned to the base, but not setting the bodies on fire.
 
When pressed whether he had set the bodies on fire, Bales said: "It's the only thing that makes sense, sir."
 
Bales's lawyers have said he is contrite about the killings.
 
Lawyer John Henry Browne described Bales as "crazed" and "broken" on the night of the attack.
 
At the time, Bales was serving his fourth tour of duty and had been drinking alcohol and snorting Valium.
 
In addition to the 16 murdered, six Afghans were injured.
 
Afghans unsatisfied
Seventeen victims were women or children, and many of them were shot in the head. Some of the bodies were piled up and burnt.Bales's defence lawyers said they had determined the soldier would not be able to prove any claim of insanity or diminished capacity.
 
While prosecutors originally said they would seek the death penalty, no US service member has been executed in more than 50 years.
 
Family members of those killed earlier told the BBC they were outraged that he might not be put to death.
 
"We will not be satisfied unless he is executed," Haji Abdul Baqi, whose cousins were killed or injured in the attack, told BBC Afghan.
 
"If they don't execute him, they are showing their power. He martyred 16 of our people, but they are not executing the one person who did all that. Would they forgive us if we killed 16 Americans?"
 

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

At least three women from the Rohingya minority were killed when police fired on protesters in Burma's Rakhine state.

  • PDF
 
alt
 
At least three women from the Rohingya minority were killed when police fired on protesters in Burma's Rakhine state.
 
The women - one of whom was pregnant - were protesting because the authorities were planning to move them to another temporary camp, local people said.
 
Last year Rakhine saw clashes between Buddhist and Muslim communities that left almost 200 people dead.
 
Tens of thousands of Rohingya Muslims remain displaced in the wake of the violence, many living in camps.
 
A community near the town of Mrauk U protested against the arrival of police in their village, local sources told the BBC.
 
The police had brought in workers and construction materials, with plans to move the community to a new camp, the sources added.
 
The reason for the police shooting remains unclear.
 
Aid agencies have been trying to get Burmese authorities to find better locations for the tens of thousands of displaced people, as the start of the monsoon rains is making their temporary camps uninhabitable, says the BBC's Jonathan Head in Bangkok.
 
This is proving difficult given the intense hostility from the local Buddhist population, our correspondent adds.
 
Burma does not recognise Rohingya Muslims as its citizens and human rights groups have accused Burmese authorities of being complicit in their persecution.
 
Sporadic outbreaks of anti-Muslim violence have continued in the wake of the Rakhine unrest last year.
 
The most recent was late last month in the northern town of Lashio, where at least one person was killed.
 
In March, at least 43 people - mostly Muslims - died in violence that erupted after an argument at a Muslim-owned shop in the central town of Meiktila.

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

A recently announced licensing scheme for online news in Singapore is effectively extending the country's strict regulation of news

  • PDF
alt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A recently announced licensing scheme for online news in Singapore is effectively extending the country's strict regulation of news and public affairs information to its relatively-freer online news media. 
 
Singaporean news media reported on Tuesday, 28 May 2013, about a fact sheet posted on the website of the Media Development Authority (MDA), which will place all online news media in the city state under a licensing regime. 
 
The MDA fact sheet explained that the new scheme gives online news media "a more consistent regulatory framework traditional news platforms" and "provides greater clarity on prevailing requirements" of the Singapore Broadcasting Act's class license for internet service and content providers, and the Internet Code of Conduct. 
 
Licenses 
 
While the full text of the new online news licensing system had not yet been posted in the MDA website's section on licenses as of 31 May, it will take effect beginning on 1 June. 
 
Initially 10 news sites, including nine from mainstream media groups, have been listed as initial targets for licensing notifications from the MDA. 
 
The licensing system will cover all news websites that post "at least one article per week on Singapore's news and current affairs" and "are visited by at least 50,000 unique IP [internet protocol] addresses" each month. 
 
News platforms requiring licensing include those which provide "any news, intelligence, report of occurrence, or any matter of public interest, about any social, economic, political, cultural, artistic, sporting, scientific or any other aspect of Singapore in any language (whether paid or free and whether at regular interval or otherwise) but does not include any programme produced by or on behalf of the Government". 
 
Presently, news sites are automatically licensed under the Broadcasting Act, with some groups required to register, including internet service providers, political parties, and individuals and groups providing programs on political and religious concerns in Singapore. 
 
Under the new scheme, sites that fall within the two criteria will have to put up a performance bond of 50,000 SGD (about 40,000 USD) for an individual license. 
 
It is not clear if the scheme will require licensees to pay annual fees or how it will apply to popular news content providers from overseas meeting the criteria. 
 
Controls 
 
Based on the fact sheet, licensing will require online news sites to obey MDA's directives to remove content within 24 hours if found to be in breach of content standards of Singapore. 
 
The new license thus adds a degree of enforceability to the country's Internet Code of Practice, which up to this point directed the content or service providers to use "best efforts to ensure that prohibited material is not broadcast via the Internet". 
 
The fact sheet did not clarify what due process guarantees exist, such as the role of judicial oversight, to protect possible infringements on the right to freedom of expression. 
 
Concerns 
 
SEAPA executive director Gayathry Venkiteswaran described the introduction of this online news licensing system as a "dangerous development which will further restrict press freedom in Singapore". 
 
Gayathry added that Singapore authorities are likely targeting the alternative media in Singapore, which remains a vibrant space for news and views that are restricted in mainstream print and broadcast outlets. 
 
Singapore's alternative media exists primarily online, she explained, since the mainstream media in the country is strictly regulated under the Newspapers and Printing Presses Act. 
 
The country's community of socio-political websites released a joint statement voicing concerns "about the impact of the newly-introduced requirement on fellow Singaporeans' ability to receive diverse news information. 
 
Gayathry echoed concerns raised by the online community in Singapore that the new licensing scheme will unfairly affect voluntary and community-run websites, and the new system was introduced without public consultation.
 

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

In a move long-dreaded by Jordanian Internet users and digital rights activists

  • PDF
 
alt
 
In a move long-dreaded by Jordanian Internet users and digital rights activists, authorities in the kingdom announced plans on 2 June 2013 to block over 200 news websites for failing to register and obtain licenses under the recently amended Press and Publications Law, previously known as the Censorship Law. 
 
Access to several of the sites has already been impeded as local Internet service providers (ISPs) were ordered to begin blocking unregistered websites after receiving a memo by Fayez al-Shawabkeh, head of the government's Department of Press and Publications. 
 
The mandatory registration was introduced as part of the amendments made to the Press and Publications Law back in September 2012, which, according to local media organisation 7iber, included articles that would hold online news sites accountable for the comments left by their readers, prohibiting them from publishing comments that are deemed “irrelevant” or “unrelated” to the article. Online news sites would also be required to archive all comments left on their servers for at least six months. 
 
“Jordan claims that it is simply regulating online journalism and upholding journalistic integrity, but in reality these amendments give authorities a tool to punish Jordanian journalists for what they write,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. 
 
The human rights organisation also noted that Articles 48 and 49 of the amended law give the Press and Publications Department director the authority to block websites that are either unlicensed or deemed to be in violation of any law, and to close the website's offices without providing a reason or obtaining a court order. The sites may then challenge the decision in the Supreme Court of Justice. 
 
According to Freedom House, the requirement that news sites must obtain government approval reinforces self-censorship and places a disproportionate burden on editors and administrators to police controversial comments posted to their sites. Several prominent news sites have recently turned off their comments sections as a result. 
 
Human Rights Watch reported that many of the sites listed in the memo prepared by Shawabkeh's office refused to obtain a license by the 17 January 2012 deadline given to them, as a show of protest against what they see as intrusions into their independence and freedom. 
 
In the last decade, the country's growing pool of online news sites have achieved unprecedented popularity. Some news sites including Sarayanews, one of the websites mentioned in the memo, have gained a larger following amongst the country's two million Internet users than even the biggest mainstream print newspapers, Al Rai and Ad Dustour. 
 
In light of this shift, the new measures can be seen as an attempt to extend government censorship from traditional media to the online sphere. 
 
"The idea of licensing news websites is contrary to the Jordanian constitution, international commitments, and public statements by the King and government," said Daoud Kuttab to the Committee to Protect Journalists. Kuttab is founder of AmmanNet, also one of the sites listed in the memo, and a recipient of CPJ's 1996 International Press Freedom Award. 
 
"It's also a punishment to the Jordanian public, because they are blocking these sites only in Jordan while the rest of the world can see the contents of these websites," he added. 
 
Jordan's official news agency quoted a statement by the press and publications department arguing that the blocking is not intended to restrict freedoms but rather to “organise the work of these websites, protect them, and keep from allowing those from outside the profession to inhabit the label of journalists…” 
 
According to a report by Index on Censorship, the amendment applies not only to Jordanian sites, but to any site that can be viewed from inside Jordan. It also points out, given the flexible and rather vague language of the law, that there appears to be few guarantees that the government won't block a site arbitrarily or simply amend the law to block sites that it wishes to target. 
 
The website arabianbusiness.com reports that “some of the more prominent pages that have apparently been blocked by the government include Qatari news portal Al Jazeera, Time Out magazine, erotic publication Penthouse and the site of the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan.” 
 
The decision comes just two weeks after the International Press Institute's World Congress, which was held in Amman 19-21 May and featured Jordan's Prime Minister Abdullah Ensour, who praised the role of the media and affirmed the importance of press freedom. 
 
According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a leading organisation in the defense of digital rights, the timing chosen to implement the decision has led some to suspect authorities deliberately waited until after the congress, to minimise global scrutiny. 
 
However, Jordanian activists and bloggers are known to stand their ground when it comes to Internet censorship. In 2012, civil society mobilized a SOPA-style blackout to protest what was then still a draft law. Now they have taken to Twitter and Facebook to express their disappointment. 
 
EFF has noted that there are ways in which Jordanians could bypass censorship, explaining that the authorities are using DNS blocking, which can be easily circumvented by switching to either Google's DNS servers or by using a service like OpenDNS. Other options are detailed in FLOSS Manual's guide, “How to Bypass Internet Censorship.” 
 
“The government is stuck in a hopeless time warp, trying to control online communications in the same ways it has tried to censor and control print media,” said Whitson, Human Rights Watch's Middle East director.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

Globovisión quickly eases combative stance after sale

  • PDF
 
alt
 
That didn't take long.
 
Nine days after the pro-opposition TV station Globovisión was sold to businessmen rumored to have close ties to the Venezuelan government, the station's new leader was welcomed to Miraflores Palace for a cordial sit-down with President Nicolás Maduro.
 
"You all know why Globovisión could not come to Miraflores Palace" in the past, Globovisión President Juan Domingo Cordero told reporters after the May 21 meeting. "That's never going to happen again."
 
Cordero was referring Globovisión's long-running battles with the late President Hugo Chávez, who died on March 5. As the conflict escalated, Chavez's socialist government denied Globovisión reporters access to official events and information and barred government officials from appearing on the station.
 
Hit with huge government fines, losing money, and facing the probability that its license would not be renewed in 2015, the owners sold a majority stake of Globovisión to Cordero and two other businessmen. Cordero insisted that the new Globovisión would cover all sides of the news while working to reduce political tensions and promote peace. The government, in turn, signaled a truce by allowing Health Minister Isabel Iturria to appear on Globovisión on Tuesday this week.
 
"The conflict and fascist manipulation exercised by many right-wing elements in this country must end," Vice President Jorge Arreaza, Chávez's son-in-law, told reporters after attending the meeting. "The goal is to have a climate of peace in which the truth prevails."
 
But some media analysts are troubled by the changes at Globovisión, even as they insist they support fair and balanced news coverage and acknowledge that Globovisión often went overboard in slamming the government and pumping up the opposition. 
 
"You need to have some middle ground. It's never good when a channel supports just one candidate or one political side," Marianela Balbi, executive director of the Caracas-based Institute for Press and Society, told CPJ.
 
The problem, Balbi and others say, is that nearly all the other TV stations in Venezuela are either run by the state and serve as government mouthpieces or have shied away from critical coverage of the government because they fear reprisals. Globovisión was a lone government watchdog on TV and one of the few outlets where opposition viewpoints could reach a mass audience. It paid a steep price, including multimillion-dollar fines, for its editorial position.
 
In this lopsided TV landscape, Globovisión's decision to chart a more moderate course could substantially reduce air time for government critics.  Balbi pointed out that Globovisión has already cancelled two programs that often slammed government officials--"Aunque usted no lo crea" (You won't believe this) and "Usted lo vió" (You saw it).
 
Globovisión has also discontinued its policy of providing wall-to-wall live coverage of speeches and press conferences by opposition politicians, such as Henrique Capriles, who lost to Maduro in last month's presidential election. 
 
"No media outlet is obligated to broadcast live or dedicate time to the declarations of a politician," Globovisión said in a communiqué Monday.
 
Last week, Globovisión announced that opposition legislator Ismael García would no longer anchor the "Álo, Venezuela" news program. On Monday, Francisco Bautista, a part-time communications consultant for Capriles who hosted "Buenas noches," a talk show critical of the government, announced on his Twitter account that he had been ousted from Globovisión and criticized "the censorship they are imposing."
 
In its communiqué, Globovisión said García left by mutual accord and that Bautista was removed from his show for publicly criticizing García's departure without first speaking with Globovisión executives about the issue.
 
As Globovisión distances itself from the opposition and aims for more balanced coverage, there is no sign that pro-government TV stations are following suit by toning down official propaganda and opening their microphones to critics, said Marcelino Bisbal, who heads the post-graduate journalism program at Andres Bello Catholic University in Caracas.
 
For now, most Globovisión journalists are staying put, including several marquee names. For example, the staunchly right-wing Leopoldo Castillo continues to host of the popular "Aló, Ciudadano" call-in program and to hammer away at the Maduro government.
 
"I know there is an information imbalance and that state-run media have become propaganda organs," Castillo told viewers on Monday. "But Globovisión cannot be a battlefield trench that uses those same vices. The country demands something more."
 
Still, the Globovisión brand was built on combative journalism and the station could lose legions of loyal viewers if it goes too soft on the Maduro government. Indeed, the station immediately lost more than 200,000 of its Twitter followers amid the controversy over the exit of García and Bautista.
 
Meanwhile, viewers disgruntled with the new Globovisión as well as opposition politicians looking to spread their message may end up relying more and more on social media. When he first learned of Globovisión's new policy not to carry his speeches live, Capriles tweeted the news to his nearly 3.4 million followers.
 
"There were no press conferences, no microphones, and no reporters involved--just Henrique and his Twitter account," wrote Juan Cristobal Nagel on the widely read blog Caracas Chronicles. "While it is tempting to be frightened at Globovisión's demise, it's possible that we may not need it in the end." 
 

Warning: Parameter 3 to plgContentYAA() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/theoslo/public_html/libraries/joomla/event/dispatcher.php on line 136

Journalists in Malawi, South Africa and Zambia came under attack in separate incidents this past week.

  • PDF
 
alt
 
 
Journalists in Malawi, South Africa and Zambia came under attack in separate incidents this past week. All of the journalists affected practice as photojournalists. 
 
On Thursday, 30 May 2013, Malawian photojournalist Thoko Chikondi was punched several times by the chief parliamentary security officer at the parliament building as she went about her duties. She had been photographing a consumer rights advocate, John Kapito, who had just presented a petition to the national assembly. 
 
However, the chief security officer, identified as Youngson Chilinda, accused her of taking pictures without permission. An image which appears on the front page of today's (31 May) The Daily Times shows Chilinda with his fist raised towards the visibly-shaken female journalist while pulling her hair with the other hand. 
 
As a result of the assault, the photojournalist sustained bruises on her back and was treated at Kamuzu Central hospital in the capital, Lilongwe. The matter has since been reported to the Lingadzi Police Station. 
 
Chilinda is a retired soldier and has previously expressed political aspirations, losing out on a parliamentary seat in the last election in 2009. 
 
Anthony Kasunda, chairperson of the Malawi Chapter of the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA-Malawi) and chairperson of the MISA regional governing council, has condemned the assault on the journalist. 
 
“This is uncalled for and regrettable and a great shock to MISA. We strongly request parliament to investigate and discipline Chilinda. Parliament is a public place and Chikondi had every right to freely gather and report on what was happening at parliament. Such barbaric acts must stop,” Kasunda said. 
 
At the time of publishing this alert, it was not clear if Chilinda would be arrested. 
 
In South Africa, on 29 May 2013, photojournalist Motshwari Mofokeng was wounded in the chest when a security guard shot a rubber bullet directly at him. According to the 30 May edition of The Star, the daily newspaper Mofokeng reports for, the incident occurred while he was “covering an eviction of illegal residents living in a building once used as a factory.” 
 
In his own words, Mofokeng is quoted as saying: “I [was] shot in the chest, but (even) before that, I had been slapped twice. The guard had walked away from me as the pain intensified. We don't know who he is, or what led to the incident. But I'm sure he'll soon explain himself in a court of law.” 
 
Just before he fell to his knees after being shot, Mofokeng managed to capture the image the security guard shooting directly at him. The image, along with an inset of Mofokeng's chest wound, appeared on the front page of The Star on 30 May. 
 
The Star editor, Makhudu Sefara has said his newspaper will “exhaust every possible avenue to ensure that the man who shot Motshwari face the full brunt of the law.” 
 
He added: “Too many photographers have been beaten and even shot in the line of duty recently. Yesterday (Wednesday) they picked the wrong photographer and the wrong newspaper. We intend [to make] an example here and now before one of our colleagues is killed.” 
 
On Saturday, 25 May, Zambia Army personnel roughed up two photojournalists as they tried to capture pictures of dignitaries laying wreaths at the Freedom Statue as part of Zambia's commemoration of Africa Day. 
 
In an interview with MISA-Zambia, freelance photojournalist Jean Mandela Ndayesega and The Post newspaper photojournalist Salim Dawood, both confirmed they were roughed up when they refused to vacate the advantageous position they had stationed themselves at to capture good pictures of the event. 
 
“We tried to reason with them that we want to get good pictures of the event, but they would not listen to us and instead roughed us up”, Dawood explained. 
 
In an interview, the Zambia Army's public relations officer, Colonel Chris Musonda, said that his institution was ready to dialogue with MISA to ensure a conducive media operating environment in Zambia. “We are there for the people and we will be sure to address such matters,” Colonel Musonda said. 
 
MISA-Zambia chairperson, Nalumino Nalumino expressed disappointment at the manner in which the two photojournalists were handled by army personnel. 
 
“We wish to appeal to the Zambia[n] Army to orient their officers on how to handle the media during public events, because such incidents, if left unchecked, may lead to censorship on the part of the media and reduced access to information on the part of citizens who both the media and the army want to serve,” he said. 
 
MISA programme specialist for Media Freedom Monitoring & Research, Levi Kabwato, has described the journalists who came under fire this past week as “brave”. 
 
“They are all brave. The courage they displayed under fire is inspirational and for that we salute them. We are very relieved that none of them [were] seriously wounded or even lost their [lives],” Kabwato said. 
 
“Our promise to them, and all the journalists we serve in this region, is that we will continue to work hard in ensuring that the operating environment is not hostile and that journalist's rights are respected across [the] SADC [The South African Development Community],” he said. 
 
He added: “We also appeal to public officials and the wider public to familiarise themselves with the role of journalists in society. Some of these attacks wouldn't occur if there was sufficient understanding of the critical role played by journalists. We further ask all media houses to ensure that their staff have access to medical cover[age] and are equipped with tools and tactics that can enable them to prevent attacks when covering potentially dangerous beats.”